Re: [PATCH 1/2] Allow git-apply to fix up the line counts
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:41
Hi, On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Johannes Sixt wrote:
Johannes Schindelin schrieb:quoted
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Johannes Sixt wrote:quoted
Johannes Schindelin schrieb:quoted
+--fixup-line-counts:: + Fix up the line counts (e.g. after editing the patch without + adjusting the hunk headers appropriately).This sort of implies that there is some kind of output that tells the correct line counts. But that isn't the case (if I read the patch correctly). So I suggest to name the option --ignore-line-counts.But there is some kind of output: the hunks themselves.Is there?
Yes!
I did this (it rewrites all line counts to 1): $ git diff ..HEAD~1 | sed -e '/^@@/s/,[0-9]+ /,1 /g' | ./git-apply --fixup-line-counts and there was no output. Instead, the patch was applied.
As I said, the data is in the _hunks_, but I maybe should have added _not in the hunk headers_. So in a very real sense, you edit the hunks, and the hunk headers are adjusted to that. You did not adjust the hunks, so they got applied. It seems that you think the hunk header's line counts are heeded, and the hunk adjusted, with --fixup-line-counts? Sorry, I find that rather counterintuitive.
quoted
And the line counts are not ignored, but they are actively rewritten.Of course, internally there is some sort of "output" from the fixup routine, and the line counts are rewritten and then are not ignored. But the user doesn't care about this internal procedure. From the user's perspective, the line counts of the input patch are ignored.
But they are not! There are _two_ things that are the line counts. Those numbers in the hunk header, and the real line counts of the hunks. Now, if you say they are _ignored_, would that not imply in plain English that they are left unchanged (in limbo, because those two types of numbers contradict each other)? Okay, how about shikebedding this to --adjust-line-counts? Ciao, Dscho