On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
It would make a wonderfully helpful tool less helpful.
I don't agree. Tool is tool. Every tool can be used in a wrong way.
A notice to documentation that some of functionality should be used very
carefully should be enough.
quoted
Also, having a possibility to easy remove a changeset (hardly - not
revert) without touching all other changesets on top is a function worth
to include.
The problem there is that you -- again -- lie about the committers. They
_never_ saw, approved, or tested those commits.
If I changed portion of unpublished tree, as maintainer I can combine any
patches and it might make sense to keep at least my commit dates for my
reference.
Thanks,
Jaroslav
-----
Jaroslav Kysela [off-list ref]
Linux Kernel Sound Maintainer
ALSA Project, Red Hat, Inc.