Hi,
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Pieter de Bie wrote:
On 5 jun 2008, at 02:00, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
Is "- (uint32_t *)NULL" needed?
I changed the uintmax_t to to a uint32_t. If I remove the "- (uint32_t
*)NULL", it won't return the same marks. The same is done in
get_object_mark().
Ah, I missed that again. I think I had exactly the same issue (of not
understanding) with another patch for the same area of the code.
Maybe it would be worth having two functions to describe what is done
there, for documentation purposes?
I will send an updated patch.
Thanks,
Dscho