"Shawn O. Pearce" [off-list ref] writes:
I think the behavior in 2/2 and 3/3v2 is the best we can do,...
Oh, I think you already know I agree with that. I was just pointing out
that the extra niceness would not have mattered that much in practice, but
if the code is already written and is not crappy, why not ;-)
Not blindly assuming that the remote nickname matches the actualy used
namespace under refs/remotes _is_ a good bugfix regardless of the issue of
overlapping configuration.