On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:39:44PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Last night I was going through old mail-logs and found this and another
one that this is a follow-up to, which I think are still needed. Does
anybody see anything wrong with them?
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
We always use 'utf-8' as the encoding, since we currently
have no way of getting the information from the user.
Ah, thanks for bringing this up. I noticed a few weeks ago that it
hadn't been applied and meant to bring it up, but somehow I failed to
do so.
Obviously I'm in support of this one, but I also think Horst's patch
looks correct.
-Peff