Re: [PATCH v2 04/13] Teach rebase interactive the mark command

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

And I try to stress that while we are still in the drawing board phase, 
because it would be painful to change once we start with a language 
without enough expressiveness.

Unfortunately, we are no longer in the drawing board phase, because the 
offending code is already in 'next'.

What does that mean?  "Now we are committed to it, so I will stop
complaining and work within the overall design in a more constructive
way"?

We have precedence of even reverting the whole series from 'next'. When
there is a better design available, I think it is perfectly fine to
improve what is in 'next' in a way that is not backward compatible with
stuff that has not hit 'master'.  That is what 'next' is for.