Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add --blob-filter option to filter-branch.
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:31
Hi, On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Avery Pennarun wrote:
From: Jeff King <redacted> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:51:14PM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote:quoted
Do you think git would benefit from having a generalized version of this script? Basically, the user provides a "munge" script on the command line, and there's a git-filter-branch mode for auto-munging (with a cache) every file in every checkin. Even if it's *only* ever used for CRLF, I can imagine this being useful to a lot of people.It was easy enough to work up the patch below, which allows git filter-branch --blob-filter 'tr a-z A-Z' However, it's _still_ horribly slow. Shell script is nice and flexible, but running a tight loop like this is just painful. I suspect filter-branch in something like perl would be a lot faster and just as flexible (you could even do it in C, but you'd probably have to invent a little domain-specific scripting language). It is still much better performance than a tree filter, though: $ cd git && time git filter-branch --tree-filter ' find . -type f | while read f; do tr a-z A-Z <"$f" >tmp mv tmp "$f" done ' HEAD~10..HEAD real 4m38.626s user 1m32.726s sys 2m51.163s $ cd git && git filter-branch --blob-filter 'tr a-z A-Z' HEAD~10..HEAD real 1m40.809s user 0m36.822s sys 1m14.273s Lots of system time in both. I'm sure we spend a fair bit of time hitting our very large map and blob-cache directories, which would be much more nicely implemented as associative arrays in memory (if we were using a more featureful language). Anyway, here is the patch. I don't know if it is even worth applying, since it is still painfully slow.
Not all of this belongs in the commit messaage.
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted>
This does. A good general rule is: if you think it would be funny/strange to read this message in the output of "git log", it should be changed. Ciao, Dscho