Hi,
On Tue, 25 Mar 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
diff --git a/builtin-init-db.c b/builtin-init-db.c
index 1975910..ceb4727 100644
--- a/builtin-init-db.c
+++ b/builtin-init-db.c
@@ -168,10 +168,9 @@ static int create_default_files(const char *git_dir, const char *template_path)
{
unsigned len = strlen(git_dir);
static char path[PATH_MAX];
- unsigned char sha1[20];
struct stat st1;
char repo_version_string[10]; int reinit;
Here I saw a hand-edit, but that is less of a problem...
Heh, yes. I originally set reinit = 0, and thought I was clever by patch
editing. But I have less experience with that than necessary, and then, I
am not as clever as I thought, either... ;-)
quoted
int filemode;
if (len > sizeof(path)-50)
@@ -220,7 +219,7 @@ static int create_default_files(const char *git_dir, const char *template_path)
* branch, if it does not exist yet.
*/
strcpy(path + len, "HEAD");
- reinit = !read_ref("HEAD", sha1);
+ reinit = !access(path, R_OK);
If this is a HEAD (or .git/HEAD) that is a dangling symlink (we do still
support them, don't we?) wouldn't this access fail?
Right. I already saw your commit, and while I would have to think hard if
it is implementing the correct logic (what does access() do with a
dangling symlink? Is || correct?), I just trust you.
Although I have to admit that having the authorship of this commit is
giving me more credit than I deserve.
Thanks,
Dscho