Re: auto gc again

Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] writes:

So you have 17.1 seconds for a single pack vs 18.4 seconds for 66 packs.

Compare that to 24.9s without that patch.

Very interesting --- why should it affect a single pack case at all?

And I still have some further optimizations to implement eventually 
(http://marc.info/?l=git&m=118062793413099&w=2), but which would 
probably make a significant difference only in the hundreds-of-packs 
case anyway.

So I really think that the default gc.autopacklimit could be raised.

Thanks, let's raise it to 50 then.

But I am still puzzled...