Re: [PATCH] Don't update unchanged merge entries
From: Daniel Barkalow <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:23
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
In commit 34110cd4e394e3f92c01a4709689b384c34645d8 ("Make 'unpack_trees()'
have a separate source and destination index") I introduced a really
stupid bug in that it would always add merged entries with the CE_UPDATE
flag set. That caused us to always re-write the file, even when it was
already up-to-date in the source index.
Not only is that really stupid from a performance angle, but more
importantly it's actively wrong: if we have dirty state in the tree when
we merge, overwriting it with the result of the merge will incorrectly
overwrite that dirty state.
This trivially fixes the problem - simply don't set the CE_UPDATE flag
when the merge result matches the old state.While you're at it, you should at least fix the comment. I actually think it would be better to have update start out 0 and be set to CE_UPDATE after verify_uptodate() and verify_absent(), since those checks are what verifies that using CE_UPDATE is okay. -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*