Re: [PATCH] git-rev-parse.txt: clarify meaning of rev~ and rev~0.

Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:

On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Sergei Organov wrote:

quoted

+                      ...  'rev{tilde}' is equivalent to 'rev{tilde}0'
+  which in turn is equivalent to 'rev'.

I'd actually prefer to just fix that. 

I think it would make more sense to have the same guarantees that rev^ 
has, namely to always return a commit. I would also suggest that not 
giving a number would have the same effect of defaulting to 1, not 0.

Right now it's a bit illogical, but at least it's an _undocumented_ 
illogical behaviour. If we document it, we should fix it and document the 
logical behaviour instead, no?

Yeah, I like it.  Not that I looked at your patch yet (which needs to wait
til evening), but I agree with the intent.