Re: The meaning of x~0 and x~ as rev-spec.

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

Sergei Organov [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Testing suggests that <name>~0 and <name>~ are the same and are just
synonyms for <name> as rev-specs. Is that correct? Is that by design, or
by accident?

sed -n -e '/name~3/,/x = 0;/p' sha1_name.c

OK, I'll send a patch for documentation.

-- Sergei.