Re: git-branch -m interprets first argument differently when two are supplied

Hi,

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brandon Casey wrote:

Johannes Schindelin wrote:

quoted

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Brandon Casey wrote:

quoted

It's the two argument case that both expects its arguments in a 
different order than other commands _and_ is dangerous in the case of 
-M.

The order was specifically requested, as "mv" also has that order.

Did you even read the original message? You point this out like it 
hasn't already been mentioned.

Yes, I had read it, but I had the impression that the rationale for the 
current behaviour made a heck of a lot of sense.

quoted

Don't use it, if you don't know what you're doing.

Gee, thanks for the advice.

You're welcome, as always.

Ciao,
Dscho