Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
When the patch reports a line number that is larger than the number of
lines in the current version of the file, git-apply used to segfault.
I have to wonder if the correct fix should be like this
instead. Under that condition, I think computation of the
initial "try" value already oversteps the line[] array for the
original image.
With tests...
builtin-apply.c | 3 ++
t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-apply.c b/builtin-apply.c
index 2b8ba81..177f541 100644
--- a/builtin-apply.c
+++ b/builtin-apply.c
@@ -1809,6 +1809,9 @@ static int find_pos(struct image *img,
else if (match_end)
line = img->nr - preimage->nr;
+ if (line > preimage->nr)
+ line = preimage->nr;
+
try = 0;
for (i = 0; i < line; i++)
try += img->line[i].len;
diff --git a/t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh b/t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..9c2a9f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='apply with fuzz and offset'
+
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+dotest () {
+
+ name="$1" && shift &&
+
+ test_expect_success "$name" "
+ git checkout-index -f -q -u file &&
+ git apply $* &&
+ diff -u expect file
+ "
+
+}
+
+test_expect_success setup '
+
+ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
+ do
+ echo $i
+ done >file &&
+ git update-index --add file &&
+ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a b c d e 8 9 10 11 12
+ do
+ echo $i
+ done >file &&
+ cat file >expect &&
+ git diff >O0.diff &&
+
+ sed -e "s/@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@/@@ -2,6 +2,11 @@/" >O1.diff O0.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@/@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@/" >O2.diff O0.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@/@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@/" >O3.diff O0.diff &&
+
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F0.diff O0.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F1.diff O1.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F2.diff O2.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F3.diff O3.diff
+
+'
+
+dotest 'unmodified patch' O0.diff
+
+dotest 'minus offset' O1.diff
+
+dotest 'plus offset' O2.diff
+
+dotest 'big offset' O3.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with no offset' -C2 F0.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with minus offset' -C2 F1.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with plus offset' -C2 F2.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with big offset' -C2 F3.diff
+
+test_done