Jari Aalto [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
Suggest putting additional message inside brackets, like [PATCH v2]
for reworked content.
Signed-off-by: Jari Aalto <jari.aalto AT cante.net>
---
Idea by Jakub Narebski
Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index de08d09..69ecbd3 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ Checklist (and a short version for the impatient):
maintainer (gitster@pobox.com). If you use
git-send-email(1), please test it first by sending
email to yourself.
+ - If you rework the patch, announce the message
+ in brackets. For example "[PATCH/RFC]", "[PATCH (resend)]",
+ "[PATCH v2]" etc.
This adds something to the "short version" that the full version
does not even talk about?
I do not think this needs to be in the short version, but an
update to the full version would indeed be a good idea.
diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index de08d09..0661293 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -112,7 +112,12 @@ lose tabs that way if you are not careful.
It is a common convention to prefix your subject line with
[PATCH]. This lets people easily distinguish patches from other
-e-mail discussions.
+e-mail discussions. Use of additional markers after PATCH and
+the closing bracket to mark the nature of the patch is also
+encouraged. E.g. [PATCH/RFC] is often used when the patch is
+not ready to be applied but it is for discussion, [PATCH v2],
+[PATCH v3] etc. are often seen when you are sending an update to
+what you have previously sent.
"git format-patch" command follows the best current practice to
format the body of an e-mail message. At the beginning of the