Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:09
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored · Tilman Sauerbeck <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored · Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored · Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFH] revision limiting sometimes ignored · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
By the way, the issue does not have anything to do with merges. This is the absolute minimum (and reliable) reproduction recipe. You need four commits. If you remove "commit three &&", the traversal will contaminate "one". --- t/t6009-rev-list-parent.sh | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t6009-rev-list-parent.sh b/t/t6009-rev-list-parent.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..1da5dbb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t6009-rev-list-parent.sh@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +test_description='properly cull all ancestors' + +. ./test-lib.sh + +commit () { + test_tick && + echo $1 >file && + git commit -a -m $1 && + git tag $1 +} + +test_expect_success setup ' + + touch file && + git add file && + + commit one && + + test_tick=$(($test_tick - 2400)) + + commit two && + commit three && + commit four && + + git log --pretty=oneline --abbrev-commit +' + +test_expect_failure 'one is ancestor of others and should not be shown' ' + + git rev-list one --not four >result && + >expect && + diff -u expect result + +' + +test_done