Re: [PATCH] More test cases for sanitized path names

Robin Rosenberg [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

quoted

+test_expect_failure 'add a directory outside the work tree' '
+	d1="$(cd .. ; pwd)" &&
+	git add "$d1"
+	echo $?
+'

Oops. Remove the echo $?. It still fails, i.e. git add succeeds when
it shouldn't. I was double checking it just before sending the patch.

Ah, you found breakages.

I could not quite tell what you meant by these tests with
test_expect_failure, either they were misuse or "currently fails
but they shouldn't".  Coming up with a small reproducible
failure case is 50% of solving the problem.  That's very
appreciated.

In any case, I think the large-ish test framework update patch I
sent tonight should go in very early post 1.5.4 cycle, so plesae
use the new-and-improved test_expect_failure to mark these
reproducible failure cases.  Also, there is no need for hurry
for you to just send test cases without fixes.  When I say I do
not take patches early, I do mean it --- I do not even take _my_
own patches like the one you are following up on.  I've sent
quite a many of them, and I think some are on 'pu' or 'offcuts',
but most are only in the list archive.  If nobody cares deeply
enough about them to test and resend with Tested-by: , I am not
planning to go back to pick them up.

quoted

 * First, the obvious one.  You are creating a garbage file
   outside of t/trash directory.  Don't.  If you need to, dig a
   test directory one level lower inside t/trash and play around
   there.

Can we move the default trash one level down for all tests? That
would give us one free level to play with.

I'd rather not.  Most tests do not have to step outside and it
is very handy to debug any breakage they find by always being
able to go there with "cd t/trash".