Miklos Vajna [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:38:55PM +0100, Jim Meyering [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Here is an illustration, by Jon Loeliger. Both node B and C are
-a commit parents of commit node A. Parent commits are ordered
+commit parents of commit node A. Parent commits are ordered
wouldn't this be "Both commit node B and C are parents of commit node A."?
That does sound better.
While you're word-smithing, how about s/node B/nodes B/, too:
"Both commit nodes B and C are parents of commit node A."
Send a patch.
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <redacted>
---
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:56:27PM +0100, Jim Meyering [off-list ref] wrote:
Send a patch.
here it is.
Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt b/Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt
index af98882..f02f6bb 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-rev-parse.txt
@@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ blobs contained in a commit.
(typically the current branch), and stage 3 is the version from
the branch being merged.
-Here is an illustration, by Jon Loeliger. Both node B and C are
-commit parents of commit node A. Parent commits are ordered
+Here is an illustration, by Jon Loeliger. Both commit nodes B
+and C are parents of commit node A. Parent commits are ordered
left-to-right.
G H I J--
1.5.4.rc5-dirty