On 2008-01-23 11:35:03 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:

On 18/01/2008, Karl Hasselström [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

The following changes since commit
5b2666bab799830ac5e511f35103d04fc3968b32:

I merged your patches but I have some wishes. Could we keep pretty
much the same reporting messages? For example, pushing reports a
conflict but it no longer lists which files conflicted.

Mmm, that's a regression. Will try to see where that got lost.

The 'goto' checks the local status before pushing but doesn't report
this (and my machine is slow and it might wait even 20 seconds or
more, it is useful to get some messages).

No, it doesn't anymore, so it should be faster than before. Instead of
checking the entire tree for cleanliness, it just relies on
git-read-tree -u -m to abort without changes if any of the files that
need updating are dirty.

This goes for all commands using the new infrastructure, by the way.
They share a _lot_ of code.

The pop/push commands report that the action took place. The one
with "action ... done" was friendlier I think, especially with the
'pop' command reporting that it popped the patches but it waits
quite a lot before returning.

Yes, I agree that the current output is not optimal.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle