(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer? · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH] pull --rebase: be cleverer with rebased upstream branches · Johannes Schindelin <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer?

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:07

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

2016-06-15 · Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer? · Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
2016-06-15 · Re: Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer? · Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
2016-06-15 · Re: Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer? · Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
2016-06-15 · Re: Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer? · Nicolas Pitre <hidden>

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

However, if we already have refs/remotes/blabla/master, we could DWIM the 
--rebase call to

	git rebase --onto FETCH_HEAD refs/remotes/blabla/master

FWIW, I like it, and I think that is what users expect it to do.