On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:00:56AM +0300, Dmitry Potapov wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 08:00:18AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
quoted
That said, the "decomposed" version of UTF-8 has nice side effects on
OSX, with UTF-8 encoded RockRidge ISO-9660 volumes (with or without
Joliet ; OSX will use RockRidge by default when it's there), for instance.
AFAIK, the RockRidge standard prescribes to use the portable character
set,
Actually, it prescribes to use the portable *filename* character set,
which is even more restrictive than just portable character set.
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap03.html#tag_03_276
Anyway, there is no place for UTF-8 in it.
Dmitry