On Wed, 16 Jan 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Brandon Casey [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
My patch does this, though I understand it may take some time to review.
I left the lk->fd unmodified when close() failed in case the caller
would like to include it in an error message.
But that would bring us back to the same double-close issue,
wouldn't it?
Yes it would. Although I knew it would happen, I was disregarding
_that_ double close case for some reason.
You're right, your's and Linus's version is better.
-brandon