Re: Allowing override of the default "origin" nickname
From: Mark Levedahl <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:04
On Jan 11, 2008 7:03 AM, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:
Hi, IIUC your patch only replaces the term "origin" by something user-specifiable. I fail to see the use of it; care to explain what workflow is easier with your patches than without? Ciao, Dscho
Consider a project with several servers, each of which is *supposed* is host the same project but due to lags in mirroring across airgaps, etc., are never quite in sync. Now, we get on a teleconference and discuss issues, find differences, and everyone reports that "origin" has x, but in fact "origin" means different servers to almost everyone. Also consider that only a small subset of the group really understands git, most just follow cook-book recipes to get their work done and don't understand what is going on. This is my problem: "origin" is an abstraction that hides the different server names in use and makes communication difficult, having everyone use nicknames related to their particular upstream server reduces the confusion. Mark