Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
From: Johannes Sixt <redacted>
How come we got along with this not very portable construct for so long?
Probably because the array sizes were computed from the results of
strlen() of string constants. Anyway, a follow-up patch will make the
lengths really non-constant.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <redacted>
---
sideband.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sideband.c b/sideband.c
index 756bbc2..513d7b3 100644
--- a/sideband.c
+++ b/sideband.c
@@ -19,7 +19,10 @@ int recv_sideband(const char *me, int in_stream, int out, int err)
{
unsigned pf = strlen(PREFIX);
unsigned sf = strlen(SUFFIX);
- char buf[pf + LARGE_PACKET_MAX + sf + 1];
+ char *buf, *save;
+
+ save = xmalloc(sf);
+ buf = xmalloc(pf + LARGE_PACKET_MAX + sf + 1);
I have to wonder if the malloc() overhead is small enough
compared to the network bandwidth to make a two malloc-free
pairs per packet a non-issue...