Thread (21 messages) flat view 21 messages, 7 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] provide advance warning of some future pack default changes

From: J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:00

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 01:13:18PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
	Sure, we're not complaining about that.  We complain some about
the fast pace (at the time he had his problem, 1.4 installs were not
unusual, and Junio's response suggested that "I use NFS" wasn't strongly
considered as a use case), but more we complain about the obscurity of
the reason.  If it's obvious what happened (not the specifics, just
"please upgrade" or "repository format changed" or something), the user
moves along.
By the way, just as a data point: I do keep some git repositories on
NFS, and access them from multiple machines with different git versions
(not on purpose--it's just that the machines don't all run the same
distro, so it'd be extra work to give them all the same version).  I
don't use anything older than 1.5.0.  If the repository became unusable
on one of those machines without warning it'd be annoying.

---b.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help