Re: [PATCH] Brown paper bag fix to previous send-email change

Mike Hommey [off-list ref] writes:

On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:04:36PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Mike Hommey [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

My previous change led to the In-Reply-To header being <> when the given
value was empty. This fixes it.

Signed-off-by: Mike Hommey <redacted>
---

 I think I have an antispam problem somewhere with this patch, because even
 keeping sending it, it never reached the list. And Junio didn't answer to my
 private message about it, so I guess that was some server being smart with
 the subject line. *sigh*

 PS: sorry Junio if you get this patch multiple time.

No, I happened to have noticed the same and have an almost identical fix
(I said "defined $initial_reply_to") already queued in my tree.

Testing "defined $initial_reply_to" might not be enough, because $initial_reply_to
can be defined and empty.

And if empty what does your regexp do?  Produce "<>"?  How's that
useful?