Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v4] Allow update hooks to update refs on their own.

From: Steven Grimm <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:56

On Dec 2, 2007, at 6:16 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
..., but an
"ok, but btw I changed your commit" status from receive-pack seems  
like
it would be useful, for two reasons:
Sensible argument.  I stand corrected.
If we want that status in principle, I'd argue that sending down the  
updated commit SHA1 is actually the right way to indicate it, because  
it gives the client all the information it needs to make an  
intelligent choice about what to do next. If you don't transmit the  
modified SHA1, the client will have to do another fetch to find out  
what rewriting was done by the server, and if another push happened in  
the meantime, the client will have to basically guess about which  
commits correspond to the ones it pushed.

I'm going to have to modify the "ok" line for this either way, and  
it's not like the extra 39 bytes (for sending a hex SHA1 instead of a  
one-character status indicator) is going to hurt in any but the  
narrowest corner cases.

But if people really object to that, I will add a simple flag to the  
"ok" line.

-Steve
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help