Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [RFC] use typechange as rename source

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:55
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:35:08PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Sorry for the earlier broken one.  Here is the correct one I wanted to
send out.

By the way, this breaks some tests in t4008 (break-rewrite test) because
the test expects the behaviour you found counterintuitive (which was the
reason we have this thread).
OK, this looks reasonable to me, and it produces diff results (with -B)
that make sense for typechanges. Looking at the failing test in t4008, I
like the new behavior better.

And maybe something like this on top for git-status?
diff --git a/wt-status.c b/wt-status.c
index 0e0439f..e77120d 100644
--- a/wt-status.c
+++ b/wt-status.c
@@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ static void wt_status_print_updated(struct wt_status *s)
 	rev.diffopt.format_callback_data = s;
 	rev.diffopt.detect_rename = 1;
 	rev.diffopt.rename_limit = 100;
+	rev.diffopt.break_opt = 0;
 	wt_read_cache(s);
 	run_diff_index(&rev, 1);
 }
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help