Re: [PATCH] git-stash: Display help message if git-stash is run without sub-commands

"Kevin Leung" [off-list ref] writes:

On Nov 30, 2007 4:41 PM, Mike Hommey [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Still, 'git stash' alone should *do* the stash.

How about `git stash' still does the stash, and `git stash llist'
exits with usage message? And if you want to save the stash with name,
you can only do it with `git stash save name_of_stash'.

Sounds like a sensible thing to do.