Re: [PATCH] git-stash: Display help message if git-stash is run without sub-commands

Hi,

On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Kevin Leung wrote:

The current git-stash behaviour is very error prone to typos. For 
example, if you typed "git-stash llist", git-stash would thought that 
you wanted to save to a stash named "llist", but in fact, you meant 
"git-stash list".

I am fine with your patch.  I would be equally fine with "git stash" still 
choosing a default message and stashing.

And yes, I agree that the "git stash <whatever>" might be a little too 
error-prone.

Ciao,
Dscho