Re: [PATCH] Move all dashed form git commands to libexecdir

On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:13:04PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:

quoted

My point is that (2) is already implemented for every program (shell or
no) which understands filename completion, and there is a proposal for
taking it away. I would consider that, except I haven't see any claimed
advantages except that the hardlinks are awful under Windows.

Weren't enough complaints about Git having waaaaaaaaaaay too many 
commands?  Didn't those complaints come about often enough already?

	$ git-[tab]
	Display all 135 possibilities? (y or n)

Go back and read the thread to which you are responding. I am _not_
arguing against moving those commands to $(libexecdir) where no sane
user will ever see them. That change addresses the issue you are talking
about.

I _am_ arguing against removing them entirely, for those of us who want
to go to the trouble of enabling this (by putting a non-standard entry
into our PATH). Because the issue you are talking about will already
have been dealt with, it is no longer a compelling reason to remove the
hardlinks entirely.

The only reason I have heard to remove them entirely is that Windows
doesn't properly support hardlinks, which I addressed in my other mails
(and to which I have seen no rebuttal).

-Peff