Re: Rollback of git commands
From: Steven Grimm <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:54
On Nov 28, 2007, at 1:47 PM, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
(That is, "git rebase -i" seems to work fine for making changes to a single logical patch series, all of whose patches are prepared locally and aren't independantly named in some particular fashion; the things that aren't handled are "I need to replace the pull of netdev.git with a new pull of netdev.git" or "I need to replace '[PATCH] fix-the-frobnozzle-gadget' with '[PATCH v2] fix-the-frobnozzle-gadget'.)
I use rebase -i for that last case and it works fine -- I mark the appropriate commit as "edit" in the patch list and the rebase stops there, at which point I can update the patch in any way I see fit: tweak it a bit, replace it with a different change entirely, change the commit message, etc. What's missing from rebase -i in that respect? I guess it's not as easy to script for automated patch replacement. -Steve