Re: [PATCH] Allow update hooks to update refs on their own

On Nov 28, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Jeff King wrote:

Hrm, this is going to have nasty conflicts with 'next', which already
does the remote ref matching. I think the best way to implement this
would probably be on top of the jk/send-pack topic in next, and add a
new REF_STATUS_REMOTE_CHANGED status type.

Ah, yes, I see what you mean. Okay, please ignore my latest patch -- I  
will redo it on top of "next" later today/tonight.

Well, actually, I would still like opinions on one thing: What do  
people think of having git-push do a fetch if the remote side changes  
a ref to point to a revision that doesn't exist locally? Is there a  
situation where you'd ever want to *not* do that?

-Steve