Re: Rebase/cherry-picking idea

"Shawn O. Pearce" [off-list ref] writes:

So I guess we could rename those two "internal" environment variables
to use a leading _ to make them different from "user level" variables,
but why change them now?  I really don't see a compelling reason to
break that part of the "API" between porcelain/plumbing.

I don't either, which means I do not see a compelling reason to have
underscore in front of that cherry-pick message environment either.

About the patch itself, I think replacing the whole message, not just
"and commit the result." part, might make more sense.

	help_message = getenv("_GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP");
	fprintf(stderr, "Automatic %s failed.  "
		"After resolving the conflicts,\n"
		"mark the corrected paths with 'git add <paths>' "
		"and %s.\n", me,
		help_message ? help_message : "commit the result");
	if (action == CHERRY_PICK && !help_message) {
		fprintf(stderr, "When commiting, use the option "
			"'-c %s' to retain authorship and message.\n",
			find_unique_abbrev(commit->object.sha1,
			...

Some other caller can be written to guide the user resolving and do the
"git add" part for the user, and "mark the corrected paths with 'git add
<paths>'" may not suit the need for such a caller.

Which would mean:

	help_message = getenv("GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP");
        if (!help_message) {
        	static char helpbuf[1024];
                help_message = helpbuf;
                sprintf(help_message,
                	"  After resolving the conflits,\n"
			"mark the corrected paths with 'git add <paths>' "
			"and commit the result.\n"
			"When commiting, use the option "
			"'-c %s' to retain authorship and message.\n",
			find_unique_abbrev(commit->object.sha1,
						DEFAULT_ABBREV));
        }
	fprintf(stderr, "Automatic %s failed.%s", help_message);
	exit(1);

But I do not care too deeply either way.