Re: Backing git repos to tape?
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:53
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:quoted
Jakub Narebski wrote:quoted
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:quoted
Is there a preferred way to do the above? To do a full backup I could just copy the whole repo, but how do I do inrecmental backups(and restore)?Try git-bundle. There were in the mailing list archive the recipe on how to do an "incremental" bundle... ..ahh, there it is, by Johannes "Dscho" Schindelin: git bundle create retort.bundle --all \ --not $(git ls-remote the-other.bundle | cut -c1-40)Thanks, will look into git bundle
Please note however thatgit-bundle was created for easy and efficient off-line (sneakernet) transport, not for backups of repositories. Nevertheless it might be a good tool to use.
Just did a
git ls-remote ./.
in my linux repo and got a lot of ^{} in the printout.
What do the ^{} mean?
...
0b8bc8b91cf6befea20fe78b90367ca7b61cfa0d refs/tags/v2.6.23
7d57c74238cdf570bca20b711b2c0b31a553c1e5 refs/tags/v2.6.23-rc1
f695baf2df9e0413d3521661070103711545207a refs/tags/v2.6.23-rc1^{}[...]
----
git-rev-parse(1):
SPECIFYING REVISIONS
--------------------
A revision parameter typically, but not necessarily, names a
commit object. They use what is called an 'extended SHA1'
syntax. Here are various ways to spell object names.
[...]
* A suffix '^' followed by an empty brace pair
(e.g. `v0.99.8^{}`) means the object could be a tag,
and dereference the tag recursively until a non-tag object is
found.
----
refs/tags/v2.6.23-rc1 is a ref which points to a _tag object_ 7d57c742...,
which in turn points to commit f695baf2...
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland