Re: Wishlist for a bundle-only transport mode
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:53
Hi, On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Santi B?jar wrote:
On Nov 21, 2007 4:59 PM, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Santi B?jar wrote:quoted
1) git-clone does not accept a bundle file, even if git-fetch does. I've made a patch to use git-fetch in git-clone for this.This, along with rewriting git-clone as a very thin wrapper over git-init, -remote and -fetch, is a really low hanging fruit.For the basic/normal mode it can be a very thin wrapper but you have to support --local, --shared, --reference...
That is not all that difficult.
quoted
quoted
2) The bundles created with "git bundle" does not record the HEAD, they resolve the symbolic name to a branch name.It imitates ls-remote output.No, it does not. With a newly created project with one commit: $ git ls-remote git.git b71992713c17c3a29f9566e1b50e8cf402375faf HEAD b71992713c17c3a29f9566e1b50e8cf402375faf refs/heads/master $ git bundle create git.bdl HEAD master $ git bundle list-heads git.bdl b71992713c17c3a29f9566e1b50e8cf402375faf refs/heads/master b71992713c17c3a29f9566e1b50e8cf402375faf refs/heads/master
Ah, I misunderstood. I thought you were expecting that the first line would read refs/heads/master HEAD Alas, this behaviour stems from dwim_ref() returning "refs/heads/master" as real ref. I am not quite sure how to solve this, though. Let me see what I can come up with. Ciao, Dscho