Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
Gah, sorry. This crept in because I based it on the previous, broken
version of the other patch series which had the same problem (and
obviously this chunk is just a pure code move + reindent).
But pretend like it was competently prepared and give your comments on
the idea. ;)
Heh, at least I've privately queued it at the tip of
jk/send-pack for review but not merged it to 'next' yet, after
fixing it up (the last round I also fixed up so that was partly
why I noticed -- the patch did not apply).
The idea feels sound, and code under cursory look was fine.