Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 1/2] send-pack: cluster ref status reporting

From: Alex Riesen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:52

Jeff King, Tue, Nov 20, 2007 12:18:01 +0100:
Instead of intermingling success and failure, we now print:

  1. all uptodate refs (if args.verbose is enabled)
  2. successfully pushed refs
  3. failed refs
I vote for this. The non-ff refs clustered together was the real
reason behind my beautification patch.
I am somewhat ambivalent on this patch. In most cases, it won't make a
difference, since the output is small enough. For large pushes, it might
be better to have errors at the end. OTOH, you do still get "error:
failed to push to ..." at the end, and you can scroll up and see the
errors if you like. And it's not like preserving the original ref output
order was all that interesting.
It is just simplier to distinguish visually: non-ff's are formatted
significantly different. You don't even have to read what is written
to immediately notice if there are problems.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help