Hi,
On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Francesco Pretto wrote:
I simply tried to make this document more useful and helpful for a wider
audience of people that could ever consider of using git in their life.
And yes, I decided to so because I had trouble myself during initial
configurations. What's the problem if a document called "git for CVS
users" is more explicated? What's the problem if it contains as many as
possible informations to set up git in a viable way and, hopefully, to
learn something on how it does work?
I refrained from commenting on that patch until now, but alas, you force
me to.
I was pretty unimpressed by the additions, as they seemed large in volume,
but small in content.
Remember, those who read "git for CVS users" are _unwilling_ to spend the
time reading git documentation (at least for the most part). If they
encounter something which is not useful to them, they will not just ignore
it, they will stop reading.
Ciao,
Dscho