On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 09:33:40PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
When both GIT_DIR and GIT_WORK_TREE are set, and
setup_git_directory_gently() changes the current working
directory accordingly, it should also set inside_work_tree = 1.
Without this, work_tree handling code in setup_git_directory()
will be activated. If you stay in root work tree (no prefix),
it does not harm. It does if you work from a subdirectory though.
Please add automated test script for this, thanks.
Thank you for reminding. I tried to put a test in
t1501-worktree.sh and found out core.worktree can override
inside_work_tree previously set by setup_git_directory_gently(),
activating the worktree code in setup_git_directory() again.
This made me think setup_git_directory_gently() should use
get_git_work_tree() instead. But then git_work_tree_cfg may not be
initialized when get_git_work_tree() is called (starting from
setup_git_directory(), git_work_tree_cfg is initialized in
check_repository_format_version(), which is called _after_
setup_git_directory_gently()).
The interaction between these variables and functions is really beyond
my knowledge. Johannes, can you have a look at this? In theory the
following test should pass:
diff --git a/t/t1501-worktree.sh b/t/t1501-worktree.sh
index 7ee3820..bdb7720 100755
--- a/t/t1501-worktree.sh
+++ b/t/t1501-worktree.sh
@@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ test_expect_success 'repo finds its work tree from work tree, too' '
test sub/dir/tracked = "$(git ls-files)")
'
+test_expect_success 'Try a command from subdir in worktree' '
+ (cd repo.git/work/sub &&
+ GIT_DIR=../.. GIT_WORK_TREE=.. git blame dir/tracked)
+'
+
test_expect_success '_gently() groks relative GIT_DIR & GIT_WORK_TREE' '
cd repo.git/work/sub/dir &&
GIT_DIR=../../.. GIT_WORK_TREE=../.. GIT_PAGER= \
--
Duy