Hi,
On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"type"? That's probably better than using "which", but sounds quite
wrong. Why not add Makefile target that the shell scripts depend on to
see if necessary tools are available and let the builder know if they
are not?
I thought the accord was that "cpio" is a _runtime_ dependency. But yes,
I agree "type" is not necessarily the best choice. Maybe testing the exit
code for 127 (not found) is the better choice?
Ciao,
Dscho