Re: Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase.

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, Sergei Organov wrote:

quoted

Yes, and that's the problem. Why 'git --continue' didn't just skip this 
patch that *already became no-op* after conflict resolution and forced 
me to explicitly use 'git --skip' instead?

Isn't that obvious?  To prevent you from accidentally losing a commit.

The commit would not change anything, so what is there to lose?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum