Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Newbie: report of first experience with git-rebase.

From: J. Bruce Fields <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:45

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 03:06:20PM -0700, Steven Grimm wrote:
I've been using rebase just about every day for close to a year and it 
*still* annoys me when it happens. Especially the "Did you forget to git 
add?" part of the message. The thought that always goes through my head is, 
"No, Mr. Rebase, I did NOT forget to git add. I remembered to git add, then 
you were too stupid to do the right thing after that."

Just happened to me this morning, in fact: I had a quick hack in place to 
work around a bug, the bug got fixed for real, and I rebased. In the 
process of conflict resolution I saw that my workaround wasn't needed any 
more and accepted the upstream version of that particular part of the file. 
Ran git-add on it, then rebase --continue, and boom, was accused of 
forgetting to run git-add.

It is a minor annoyance and nowadays I just sigh a bit and run --skip 
instead, but it'd be nice if it didn't happen. I don't like having to care 
whether or not I happened to change other files in a particular commit 
after I resolve conflicts in one file in favor of the upstream version.
Yeah, I think a message saying "patch is now empty, skipping..." would
be sufficient to let the user know what's going on.  This doesn't seem
so perilous to me that it's worth requiring a positive acknowledgement.

--b.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help