Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] faster inexact rename handling

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:29:22AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

If it always gives the same results in practice, obviously
nobody can even notice.

However, merging this series to 'pu' breaks rebase-merge test
t3402 among other things.

Yes, sorry, I meant to mention the test breakage in the cover letter
(which I think is just related to the size/score normalization). This is
not really meant for applying, but more for "this is taking me a lot
longer than I hoped, so here is what is happening and you might be
interested to comment." I'm not even sure it's pu material. :)

I will continue to refine it as I mentioned in the mail to Linus, but I
am open to suggestions.

-Peff