Re: should git command and git-command be equivalent?

"David Symonds" [off-list ref] writes:

If you use the contrib/completion/git-completion.bash script, you can
type "git st<TAB>", and it'll complete it for you. Well, it did, until
git-stash came along and ruined it...

At any rate, the bash completion also completes things like branch
names, which can be immensely helpful.

I don't use bash, but the zsh completion for git is also excellent.

But "git st" is still one less key to type than "git st<tab>" ;-).

-- 
Matthieu