Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
quoted
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
Further, I am quite sure that the same mistake will happen again, until we
change the function to get the name length, not the number of bytes to
allocate.
I agree. But leaving the majority of cases using the old convention is
just confusing.
Yeah, sorry, that patch was only half-cooked.
If people agree with me, I'll redo the patch (fixing all calling sites,
too).
I think that is probably a better solution.