Re: [PATCH] Allow shell scripts to run with non-Bash /bin/sh

Eygene Ryabinkin [off-list ref] writes:

By the way, my FreeBSD is 7-CURRENT, but I'll test on 6-STABLE
and perhaps on 4-STABLE on Monday.
...

quoted

That is, what does the shell say if you do this?

	case Ultra in
        Super)
        	false ;;
	Hyper)
        	true ;;
	esac &&
        echo case returned ok

It says 'case returned ok', so I will try to understand why it
works here and does not work in the 'while' construct.

I vaguely recall somebody else had exactly this issue and he
concluded that the shell was busted.  I do not recall the
details of the story but interestingly, if he did something that
accesses "$#" before the problematic "while case $# in ..." the
shell behaved for him in his experiments.

Just to make sure you do not misunderstand me, I am not trying
to be difficult.  I am trying to assess (1) if it is sensible to
support that broken shell, and (2) if so what the exact breakage
is, especially because as the above shows the breakage does not
look like what your "fix" literally suggests, and what is
involved in working it around.

Also by my comment about "/bin/sh and bash not being the only
shells available on FreeBSD", I did not mean that you should
change your /bin/sh.  You can build git with SHELL_PATH make
varilable pointing at a non-broken shell, which does not have to
be installed as /bin/sh.