Re: Git as a filesystem

Peter Stahlir writes:

Telling git to handle -for example- deb archives and storing
everything in a pack file would take advantage of redundancy across
_all_ files.
So the /usr/share/doc of all architectures could be compressed.

Right?

You're proposing to trade off lots of CPU time in fetching many files
from a pack and making the package file -- paid every time someone
requests a package -- for at most 250 GB of space (cf Amdahl's law).

How long are your users willing to wait in exchange for 250 GB of
saved space?  How much CPU are you willing to spend for it?  Compare
those to the cost of a 300 GB hard drive (roughly $65).

There's also the cost to make git support the package format, and to
maintain that code going forward.  Those costs are also large.

Michael Poole