Re: [PATCH 2/2] add support for branch.<name>.integrationonly

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:

On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Lars Hjemli wrote:

quoted

+branch.<name>.integrationonly::

Why not have something like branch.<name>.mergeOptions instead?

Why make it plural? I agree that it's better to have a multiple values
option than having just "true/false", which makes it more extensible,
but I don't understand the kind of things you could put here that
wouldn't be better located in a separate configuration option.

-- 
Matthieu