Re: diffcore-rename performance mode

Hi,

On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Jeff King wrote:

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 01:49:50AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

quoted

However, keeping around _just_ the cnt_data caused only about 100M 
of extra memory consumption (and gave the same performance boost).

That would be an interesting and relatively low-hanging optimization.

OK, I will work up a patch. Is it worth making it configurable?

Yes, I think it would be worth making it configurable... For example, one 
of the machines I work on has only 128M.

Thanks,
Dscho